Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:01

What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Neuroscientists identify key gatekeeper of human consciousness - PsyPost
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
I'm pretty sure that my dog is transgender, how would I go about transitioning it?
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why does the UK Labour MP Jess Philips seem to be such a divisive figure?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Rangers Option Kumar Rocker - MLB Trade Rumors
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Nintendo Switch update 20.1.1 out now, patch notes - Nintendo Everything
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
‘Cheers’ star George Wendt’s cause of death confirmed - New York Daily News
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Can a 40-year-old date a 20-year-old?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?